Ordnancecorner’s Weblog

Entries from July 2007

Compare and Contrast

July 17, 2007 · 1 Comment


England:

Almost one in three people hold a “weapon” in their home to use against intruders.

Householders confessed to storing items such as golf clubs, cricket bats and heavy torches close to their beds to use in self-defence, researchers found.

And more than half of those people said they are willing to use the item as a weapon against an intruder if they had to, insurance company Cornhill Direct said.

Under UK law, anyone can use reasonable force to protect themselves or others or to prevent a crime.

But it is for a court to decide whether violence is justified in a particular set of circumstances.

The terrifying ordeal suffered by Kerry Katona and her family at the hands of burglars has brought into sharp focus the fear many people have about falling victim to violent robbers.(story)

United States

H.R.73 – Citizens’ Self-Defense Act of 2007To protect the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms in defense of self, family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement of such right.

1/4/2007–Introduced.
Citizens’ Self-Defense Act of 2007 – Declares that a person not prohibited under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act from receiving a firearm shall have the right to obtain firearms for security and to use firearms in defense of: (1) self or family against a reasonably perceived threat of imminent and unlawful infliction of serious bodily injury; (2) self or family in the course of the commission by another person of a violent felony against the person or a member of the person’s family; and (3) the person’s home in the course of the commission of a felony by another person. Authorizes persons whose rights under this Act have been violated to bring an action in U.S. district court against the United States, any state, or any person for damages, injunctive relief, and such other relief as the court deems appropriate.(link)

I have been told that by allowing its citizens access to firearms the U.S. is not a civilized society. If England is supposed to be an example of civilized society, I’ll stick with the United States thank you very much.

Categories: Gun Control

BOTW

July 17, 2007 · Leave a Comment


Categories: Photography

Thinking of offering a new service

July 17, 2007 · 1 Comment



What do you think of the bill board?

Hat Tip: Xavier Thoughts

Categories: Humor

Armed America: Portraits of Gun Owners in Their Homes Documentary

July 11, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Because of my particular situation meeting with Kyle was not a good idea, though I really wanted to. Maybe in a few years he’ll do a sequel and we can meet then.For those of you interested here is a link to his book.

Categories: Gun Control · Photography

BOTW

July 6, 2007 · Leave a Comment


Categories: Photography

Ignorance knows no boundaries

July 6, 2007 · Leave a Comment


While browsing the web tonight I came across two drastically inaccurate quotes:

Having held a used hollow point slug in my hand, I will state unequivocably that there is no valid reason any civilian should have access to that ammunition. None. The autopsy photos showed the damage one bullet inflicted. Any so-called sportsman who thinks he needs those bullets for any legitimate purpose should have his head examined or just admit that they’re sadistic ratbags.

And the following reply:

There’s actually a physics-related reason for the existence of frangible rounds.Remember, the point of shooting someone who’s attacking you (and I limit my comments to that circumstance — defense, not offense) is to STOP them. Not kill them. Stop them. That’s why you aim for the center of mass in the chest, not the head.

Now, bullets that remain in one piece can sometimes travel through a person. What they call in the CSI shows “a through-and-through.” If they do that, they have not transferred all of their momentum into the target, which is supposed to be the idea. That’s the reason behind big bullets and/or high muzzle velocities: greater momentum to transfer into the target.

A frangible round such as a hollow-point is generally better at transferring all of its momentum to the target, because it breaks up on impact and remains embedded. It is more effective at STOPPING the attacker in his tracks, even possibly driving him backward. The unfortunate side effect is that it is also more effective at killing, since the bullet becomes just so much shrapnel.

But here’s the kicker. A .45 has so much momentum on its own that even a partial transfer of momentum is usually effective at stopping an attack even if the bullet exits the target. A hollow-point .45 is really nothing more than a killer round. OR maybe in a completely contrived justification, a way to defend yourself against a charging bear? Yeah, not much other use for a hollow-point .45 than to kill. Now, smaller rounds like a .38 or a .22, I can see the greater justification for a frangible round. Especially in a .22. And .22 hollow-points are much more survivable in center-mass shots, for the same reason of them being so much smaller.

The ignorance oozing from these two comments was almost enough to get me yelling at the screen of my laptop.

So where do we start? I guess I’ll begin with the effectiveness of the .45 ACP cartridge both with standard FMJ ammunition declared “humane” by the Hague Convention, and with Hollow Point Ammunition recommended by every self-defense instructor worth his or her certification.

Many years ago Evan Marshall conducted a study to determine the effectiveness of various handgun rounds in real world shootings. His data shows that a projectile from a .45 ACP when loaded with FMJ Ammunition will cause a stop about 62% of the time. Comparable to the .380 ACP when loaded with Hollow Point Ammunition. (a round not highly recommended for personal protection) When the .45 ACP is loaded with Hollow Point Ammunition its stp percentage increases to a whopping 87%. Not too bad but no where near the king, which is the .357 Magnum propelling a 125 grain hollow point bullet at 97%.

The above data shows that when using Hollow Point ammunition you are more likely to stop the fight sooner if you use FMJ ammunition in a .45 caliber handgun. That is just one justification for Hollow Points though.

Another is the safety of bystanders and this is where one of our intrepid commenters comes close to being correct. The effect of expanding causes the bullet to shed energy, this may or may not cause it to stay in the body. However it will reduce the chances of injury to anyone nearby. Considering that every bullet you fire in a defensive situation has a lawyer attached to it, you must do everything possible to decrease your liability.

One of our commenters suggests that “A .45 has so much momentum on its own that even a partial transfer of momentum is usually effective at stopping an attack even if the bullet exits the target.” Granted the FMJ .45 ACP was chosen by the U.S. Military because it was more effective at stopping an assailant. However the U.S. Military was constrained by the Hague Convention to non-expanding ammunition. Civilians and Law enforcement are not so constrained so let’s compare penetration of the FMJ round to a Hollow Point Bullet. According to the following illustration by Martin Fackler the standard Military issue FMJ round will penetrate over 60 centimeters or 23.6 inches of tissue before stopping.

Compare the above to the following illustration also by Dr. Fackler showing a 185 grain Hollow Point from a .45 ACP

Here you can see that the Hollow Point only penetrates 25 centimeters or 9.8 inches of tissue.

Given the above which round do you think poses the least risk to bystanders?

Finally we will address the last four technical errors. 1. Hollow Point Bullets are not frangible ammunition. They are expanding ammunition. Frangible ammunition is ammunition designed to disintegrate on impact like the Glaser Safety Slug at $3.62 per shot it’s too expensive for most people to use though. 2. The purpose of using a handgun in self-defense regardless of caliber is not to kill. It is to stop the attack. In fact as lethal weapons go handguns rate as very poor killing machines. With studies showing a survival rate of around 80% for handgun wounds compared to around 30% for wounds inflicted by long arms. This is why some firearms trainers like Clint Smith of Thunder Ranch say “A handgun is there only to use to fight your way to your rifle.” This is also illustrated by examining any Police Department. All officers carry handguns, but when things get heavy they reach for their shotguns, or becoming more common their AR-15 Carbines. If .45 Caliber handguns were such great killing machines why do patrol cars still carry longarms and why do SWAT teams use long arms? 3. The .45 ACP will only make a bear mad. If one were to carry a .45 caliber firearm in bear country they would be much better served by a .454 Casull Magnum. 4. Getting shot with any firearm will NOT drive someone backwards. I don’t care how many times Hollywood shows it in movies. It just doesn’t happen! If it did the guys in the following video would be flat on their asses.

I’ll post more on the use of force and why we aim where we do later.

Categories: Hoplophobia

4th of July

July 4, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I’ve already made one 4th of July post, but I have a few more things to share with you. First up is Red Skelton delivering The Pledge of Allegiance.

I’ll follow that with The Famous Patton Speech

Finally, we have our Babe of the 4th of July.

Categories: Patriotism · Photography

The Men Who Risked Everything

July 4, 2007 · Leave a Comment


A moving speech written by Rush Libaugh Jr. The Father of the radio personality we know as Rush Limbaugh. His comments following the speech are bolded.

It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the southeast. Up especially early, a tall bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.

Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5 degrees and the horseflies weren’t nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today.

The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that “the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stockings was nothing to them.” All discussing was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks.

On the wall at the back, facing the president’s desk, was a panoply — consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it “in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!”

Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissension. “Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York.”

Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole. The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed. Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase “by a self-assumed power.” “Climb” was replaced by “must read,” then “must” was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued what he later called “their depredations.” “Inherent and inalienable rights” came out “certain unalienable rights,” and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change.

A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote.

Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: “I am no longer a Virginian, sir, but an American.” But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted.

There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.

Much To Lose

What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the crown? To each of you, the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them?

I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere.

Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56 almost half – 24 – were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, nine were landowners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.

With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th Century.

Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letters so that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward. Ben Franklin wryly noted: “Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately.”

Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: “With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone.”

These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember, a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor.
They were sober men. There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled.

It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be U.S. Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers. (It was he, Francis Hopkinson not Betsy Ross who designed the United States flag.)

Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic in his concluding remarks: “Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law.

“The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever-increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repost.

“If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American Legislatures of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens.”

Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.

William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers’ faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, “but in no face was he able to discern real fear.” Stephan Hopkins, Ellery’s colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: “My hand trembles, but my heart does not.”

“Most Glorious Service”

Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered.

· Francis Lewis, New York delegate saw his home plundered — and his estates in what is now Harlem — completely destroyed by British Soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.

· William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home they found a devastated ruin.

· Philips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.

· Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family.

· John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.

· Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.
· Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a Tory sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton’s parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause. He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the Revolution. His family was forced to live off charity.

· Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington’s appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.

· George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.

· Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.

· John Martin, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: “Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I have ever rendered to my country.”

· William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground.
· Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage, he and his young bride were drowned at sea.

· Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large landholdings and estates.

· Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson’s palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, “Why do you spare my home?” They replied, “Sir, out of respect to you.” Nelson cried, “Give me the cannon!” and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson’s sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson’s property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.

Lives, Fortunes, Honor

Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create is still intact.

And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.

He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to that infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York Harbor known as the hell ship Jersey, where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons’ lives if he would recant and come out for the King and Parliament. The utter despair in this man’s heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: “No.”

The 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. “And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”

My friends, I know you have a copy of the Declaration of Independence somewhere around the house – in an old history book (newer ones may well omit it), an encyclopedia, or one of those artificially aged “parchments” we all got in school years ago. I suggest that each of you take the time this month to read through the text of the Declaration, one of the most noble and beautiful political documents in human history.

There is no more profound sentence than this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…”

These are far more than mere poetic words. The underlying ideas that infuse every sentence of this treatise have sustained this nation for more than two centuries. They were forged in the crucible of great sacrifice. They are living words that spring from and satisfy the deepest cries for liberty in the human spirit.

“Sacred honor” isn’t a phrase we use much these days, but every American life is touched by the bounty of this, the Founders’ legacy. It is freedom, tested by blood, and watered with tears.

- Rush Limbaugh III

Categories: Patriotism

Trying real hard not to laugh

July 2, 2007 · Leave a Comment


Deputy Mayor of Washington DC Robbed at Gunpoint (story)

Categories: Gun Control · Hoplophobia · Humor

Ten things non-gun people should know about CHP holders:

July 2, 2007 · Leave a Comment



1. We don’t carry firearms so that we can ignore other basics of
personal safety. Every permit holder that I know realizes that almost
all dangerous situations can be avoided by vigilance, alertness and
by simply making wise choices about where one goes and what one does.
We don’t walk down dark alleys. We lock our cars. We don’t get
intoxicated in public or hang out around people who do. We park our
cars in well lighted spots and don’t hang out in bad parts of town
where we have no business. A gun is our last resort, not our first.

2. We don’t think we are cops, spies, or superheros. We aren’t hoping
that somebody tries to rob the convenience store while we are there
so we can shoot a criminal. We don’t take it upon ourselves to get
involved in situations that are better handled by a 911 call or by
simply standing by and being a good witness. We don’t believe our
guns give us any authority over our fellow citizens. We also aren’t
here to be your unpaid volunteer bodyguard. We’ll be glad to tell you
where we trained and point you to some good gun shops if you feel you
want to take this kind of responsibility for your personal safety.
Except for extraordinary circumstances your business is your
business, don’t expect us to help you out of situations you could
have avoided.

3. We are LESS likely, not more likely, to be involved in fights or
“rage” incidents than the general public. We recognize, better than
many unarmed citizens, that we are responsible for our actions. We
take the responsibility of carrying a firearm very seriously. We know
that loss of temper, getting into fights or angrily confronting
someone after a traffic incident could easily escalate into a
dangerous situation. We are more likely to go out of our way to avoid
these situations. We don’t pull our guns to settle arguments or to
attempt to threaten people into doing what we want.

4. We are responsible gun owners. We secure our firearms so that
children and other unauthorized people cannot access them. Most of us
have invested in safes, cases and lock boxes as well as other
security measures to keep our firearms secure. Many of us belong to
various organizations that promote firearms safety and ownership.

5. Guns are not unsafe or unpredictable. Modern firearms are well
made precision instruments. Pieces do not simply break off causing
them to fire. A hot day will not set them off. Most modern firearms
will not discharge even if dropped. There is no reason to be afraid
of a gun simply laying on a table or in a holster. It is not going to
discharge on its own.

6. We do not believe in the concept of “accidental discharges”. There
are no accidental discharges only negligent discharges or intentional
discharges. We take responsibility for our actions and have learned
how to safely handle firearms. Any case you have ever heard of about
a gun “going off” was the result of negligence on somebody’s part.
Our recognition of our responsibility and familiarity with firearms
makes us among the safest firearms owners in America.

7. Permit holders do their best to keep our concealed weapons exactly
that: concealed. However, there are times with an observant fellow
citizen may spot our firearm or the print of our firearm under our
clothes. We are very cognizant that concerns about terrorism and
crime are in the forefront of the minds of most citizens. We also
realize that our society does much to condition our fellow citizens
to have sometimes irrational fears about firearms. We would encourage
citizens who do happen to spot someone carrying a firearm to use good
judgment and clear thinking if they feel to need to take action.
Please recognize that it’s very uncommon for a criminal to use a
holster. However, if you feel the need to report having spotted a
firearm we would ask that you please be specific and detailed in your
call to the police or in your report to a store manager or private
security. Please don’t generalize or sensationalize what you
observed. Comments like “there’s a guy running around in the store
with a gun” or even simply “I saw a man with a gun in the store”
could possibly cause a misunderstanding as to the true nature of the
incident.

8. The fact that we carry a firearm to any given place does not mean
that we believe that place to be inherently unsafe. If we believe a
place to be unsafe, most of us would avoid that place all together if
possible. However, we recognize that trouble could occur at any place
and at any time. Criminals do not observe “gun free zones”. If
trouble does come, we do not want the only armed persons to be
perpetrators. Therefore, we don’t usually make a determination about
whether or not to carry at any given time based on “how safe” we
think a location is.

9. Concealed weapon permit holders are an asset to the public in
times of trouble. The fact that most permit holders have the good
judgment to stay out of situations better handled by a 911 call or by
simply being a careful and vigilant witness does not mean that we
would fail to act in situations where the use of deadly force is
appropriate to save lives. Review of high profile public shooting
incidents shows that when killers are confronted by armed resistance
they tend to either break off the attack and flee or choose to end
their own life. Lives are saved when resistance engages a violent
criminal. Lives are lost when the criminal can do as he pleases.

10. The fact that criminals know that some of the population may be
armed at any given time helps to deter violence against all citizens.
Permit holders don’t believe that every person should necessarily be
armed. We recognize that some people may not be temperamentally
suited to carry a firearm or simply may wish not to for personal
reasons. However we do encourage you to respect our right to arm
ourselves. Even if you choose not to carry a firearm yourself please
oppose measures to limit the ability of law abiding citizens to be
armed. As mentioned before: criminals do not observe “gun free
zones”. Help by not supporting laws that require citizens to be
unarmed victims.

Categories: Gun Control · Hoplophobia